Free guidance, written by mentors, open to everyone

The strongest Extended Essays are rarely the most ambitious ones. They are the ones with a question small enough to answer properly in 4,000 words and interesting enough to keep you working on it for months. Here is a way to get there.

Start with a subject you will not get bored of

You will spend a long time with this essay. Pick a subject you enjoy and a corner of it you are curious about, not the one you think looks impressive. Check with your supervisor that your idea sits inside the subject's EE guidelines, because every subject has its own expectations about sources, method and scope.

Narrow in three moves

• Topic: a broad area. "Inflation in Pakistan." "Symbolism in a novel." "Enzyme activity."
• Focus: one specific case, period, text or variable. "Food price inflation between two particular years." "One recurring symbol in two chapters." "One enzyme, one factor."
• Question: something a reader could disagree with, framed so evidence can settle it. "To what extent did X cause Y?" "How does X shape the reader's understanding of Y?" "What effect does X have on the rate of Y?"

Test the question before you commit

• Can you name three or four credible sources, or a method you can actually carry out, within a week of looking?
• Could the answer surprise you? If the answer is obvious, the essay will read as description, not analysis.
• Does every word in the question earn its place? "To what extent" invites judgement; "Is" invites a one-word answer.

Write it down, then keep refining it

Your question will change as you read. That is normal and healthy. Keep a research log of what you read and what each source changed in your thinking; it makes the reflections far easier to write later.

Want a second opinion on your question? Send it to us on WhatsApp.

Most IA stress comes from one mistake: treating the IA as a single task to be done at the end. It is five tasks, and each deserves its own slot in the calendar. Start from your submission date and work backwards.

The five stages and roughly how much of your time each deserves

• Question and design (about 20%): decide what you are investigating, what you will measure or analyse, and how. A clear design saves weeks later.
• Collecting data or material (about 25%): the experiment, the survey, the close reading, the research. Build in time for things to go wrong; they usually do once.
• Processing and analysis (about 20%): calculations, graphs, statistics, or structured analysis of your material. This is where marks are won.
• Writing the first full draft (about 20%): write to the criteria for your subject, section by section, and keep it within the word or page limit from the start.
• Feedback and revision (about 15%): one round of feedback from your teacher or mentor, then a careful revision and a referencing check.

Put real dates on it

Take the number of weeks you have, split them in the proportions above, and write each stage's end date in your calendar. If the maths gives you less than a week for any stage, simplify the investigation now rather than rushing later.

Two habits that save the most marks

• Read the assessment criteria for your subject before you start and again before each stage. Every criterion is a place marks are either earned or lost.
• Keep your raw data, drafts and sources organised in one folder from day one. Rebuilding them the night before submission is where most errors creep in.

Unsure how to split your weeks? Tell us your subject and your deadline and we will help you plan it.

An HND brief is not a vague essay title. It is a precise document that tells you what the assessor must see to award each grade. Students lose grades not because they cannot do the work but because they answer a different question from the one the brief asks. Read it like this.

Find the learning outcomes first

Every brief lists the unit's learning outcomes (usually four). Your submission must give evidence for each one. Make a checklist of them before you write a word, and tick each one off with a specific section of your work.

Take the command verbs literally

• Describe / Explain: say what something is and how it works. This is usually Pass territory.
• Analyse / Apply: break it into parts and use it on the scenario in the brief. Typical of Merit criteria.
• Evaluate / Critically evaluate / Justify: weigh strengths against weaknesses, reach a judgement, and support it with evidence. This is where Distinction lives.

Read the grading descriptors side by side

Briefs show Pass, Merit and Distinction descriptors for each learning outcome. Read them across, not down: notice what the Distinction descriptor adds to the Merit one. That difference is the specific thing you need to do more of.

Use the scenario, every time

Most briefs give you an organisation or situation. Generic theory with no link to that scenario rarely gets past Pass. Every model, law or framework you introduce should be applied to the case in front of you.

Check the practical details

• Word count or page limit, and whether appendices count.
• Referencing style (usually Harvard) and whether a reference list and bibliography are both required.
• Submission format, file naming and the exact deadline time, not just the date.

Stuck on what a brief is asking? Send us the brief and we will decode it with you.